Schlechtester PDA des Jahres 2004: IPAQ rz1715

utakurt · 03.12.2004, 23:47

War eigentlich zu erwarten mit der Speicherausstattung:

Quelle:
PC-Magazine

PDA: iPAQ used to stand for quality. Then HP bought Compaq, and you can't bet on an iPAQ anymore. Witness the fundamentally flawed iPAQ rz1715. HP's low-end PDA was designed to compete with low-cost products from Dell and Palm, but it lacks any of their redeeming qualities. The glacially slow processor and anemic memory make using it torture, but at least the pain is short lived—because the battery wears out hours before the ones on comparable units do. It's a pity this iPAQ's so bad, but don't saddle yourself or your friends, with this boat anchor. There are better products available for less. Our PDA Product guide has details.

03.12.2004, 23:47	#1
utakurt Inventar Registriert seit: 21.03.2000 Alter: 60 Beiträge: 4.329	Schlechtester PDA des Jahres 2004: IPAQ rz1715 War eigentlich zu erwarten mit der Speicherausstattung: Quelle: PC-Magazine PDA: iPAQ used to stand for quality. Then HP bought Compaq, and you can't bet on an iPAQ anymore. Witness the fundamentally flawed iPAQ rz1715. HP's low-end PDA was designed to compete with low-cost products from Dell and Palm, but it lacks any of their redeeming qualities. The glacially slow processor and anemic memory make using it torture, but at least the pain is short lived—because the battery wears out hours before the ones on comparable units do. It's a pity this iPAQ's so bad, but don't saddle yourself or your friends, with this boat anchor. There are better products available for less. Our PDA Product guide has details.

Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)