Ich habe es noch in meinen IE Cache gefunden. AVSIM und Netscape vertragen sich irgendwie nicht. Ich wollte eigentlich schon heute morgen etwas zu dem Post schreiben. In meinen Augen ist es durchaus das gute Recht von Phoenix, zu verhindern, dass Ihr Forum benutzt wird, um das eigene Geschäft zu vermiesen. Die Sache ist aber, das wohl eher falsche Behauptungen das Geschäft vermiesen.
Von der Seneca haben wir übrigens einen Test in der nächsten Ausgabe.
Schöne Grüße
Marc
I did not forget this brilliant post, Graham. But the actual quality of the Seneca, Bulldog and Airbus is making me post here.
I truly appreciate the straight way of letting everyone here recognize what to think about PSS’ way of business.
Even in your own words, the main reasons to buy one of your products are 1) FS2002 features and 2) a PSS authorship
Let’s start with 2) Yes, the 777 was great. At it’s time. More than a year ago. That’s more than a half generating in the flight sim world. All you currently try to do drain strength from the reputation you earned at that time. What about actual quality? Airbus seat positions are totally off, Seneca flight dynamics are totally off, Seneca panel is totally uninspired, the Bulldogs has serious performance issues, the airbus won’t have a FBW, no 777 patch, no 747 patch, no urgent needed Seneca patch.
Especially after paying money for the PSS Seneca, everyone will in deed consider the PSS authorship as a very special sign for quality – but luckily it’s up to the customers to decide what quality. I know you called the Seneca a feature demonstration. But as long as you charge normal money for it, you will find normal quality norms applied to it.
1) I do think that this is in deed the most important feature for PSS. Visual eye-candies like opening doors and springy gears to mislead from poorer internal quality. After landing the Seneca with the horribly flight dynamics, I can at least enjoy the opening of the door. Great for screenshots – that’s all. And to move over to even more actual PSS projects: The Airbus will look with it’s interior and exterior like an Airbus. And in a stunning way. But I wonder if you will clearly state on the website that the add-on for sale is not a real Airbus simulation because all very typical flight behaviours are completely absent because of MSFS limitations. I’m quite sure that you will once again sell eye-candy that suggests a realism that simply isn’t there.
Without wanting to offend you, I must adherence to accept that it’s obviously not your daily striving for quality but an obvious arrogance that lead you to this post.
This is disappointing for all flight simmers.
|