Ich zitiere Robert Randazzo aus dem gleichen Thread im PMDG Forum:
Zitat:
No matter what road we decide to take, someone in this forum will be unhappy- so the goal for us is to make decisions that benefit the greatest with the least inconvenience to the whole.
There are a vast number of factors to be considered- far too many for us to engage in a detailed discussion in this forum. At the end of the day, we will make a decision that is economially viable, provides the best chance of success for the code base, and benefits the greatest number of PMDG customers in our opinion.
If you were to filter back to read forum posts during the transition between FS98/FS2000, then FS2000/FS2002, then FS2002/FS2004- you will find that there are always folks who indicate that they will remain with the older version in order to preserve performance and wait for technology to catch up. Either way- the majority of the market will move forward and in order to remain viable all developers will move forward also. This is the law of business- and PMDG is subject to this law...
So please guys- lets not get into a long winded debate about upgrade preferences. We each have our own- and we'll all move to Vista/FSX in our own way.
Robert S. Randazzo
Precision Manuals Development Group
www.precisionmanuals.com
|
Die MD-11 für den FS9 ist gestorben, alles andere macht aus Sicht von PMDG ja auch keinen Sinn.
Schade, Schade!